Search
Enter Keywords:
Friday, July 4, 2008
Home arrow Luis Fernando Figari arrow Speeches arrow The Lay Faithful and Christian Life

The Lay Faithful and Christian Life

The Lay Faithful and Christian Life

Lecture of Luis Fernando Figari,
Founder of the Christian Life Movement,
at St. Mary's College, University of Surrey
Twickenham, November 10, 2003

I believe it is a great thing to reflect on the mission and life of the Church. I am thankful for being invited by Father Michael Hayes,[1] to give one of the lectures in the series on Mission and Evangelisation. They are sponsored by Saint Mary’s College, whose honourable reputation of being the oldest Catholic College, founded in 1850, is well known.

I must add that there is a beautiful symbol of special communion. Saint Mary’s College and the Christian Life Movement Feast Day are celebrated on the Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception, on December 8th. This emphasises a filial devotion to Holy Mary —as asked of us by Our Lord on the Cross— and at the same time the importance of Her Immaculate Conception in Christian life and theological thinking.

Being a reflection on the lay faithful we should remember Holy Mary was a lay woman, and what is more, the paradigm of all lay faithful. In Her own life, in the things we know about Her, we can see the light of the Sun of Justice reflecting in the Beautiful Moon, Mary. She shines in such a way that, in Her, Christian life is shown in all its wonderful splendour.

I. The layperson

To reflect on the laity is to adventure into a vital theme. Even more if it is seen in relation to the mission of the Church. For us all to reflect on the mission of the layperson is to deepen the relation of one's own Christian life, the New Evangelisation in which we all are called to work, and the construction of a more just and reconciled world.

1. Confusion and clarity

The reflection on the laity certainly is an exciting topic. In spite of how much writing and speaking has been done, who or what is a layperson seems not quite understood yet.

To better clarify our ideas we must always explore the teachings of the Second Vatican Council. If we look carefully, we discover a wonderful panorama about the identity, mission and spirituality of the lay faithful. One cannot doubt that the Council Fathers, guided by the Holy Spirit, have splendidly deepened in their teaching on the mission of the laity in the Church and in the world.

It is also necessary to highlight the homogeneous development of the teachings of the Magisterium. It is also worth noticing the light shone on the ecclesiastical identity of the laypersons in the reflections of successive Synods of Bishops, as well as in the General Conferences of Bishops in Latin America, where almost half of the world’s Catholics live.

So much has been said and clarified. One should think everything has been covered and what remains is just to put those teachings into practice. Maybe that is the main issue: Action now! Yet, I believe that a consciousness of the lay identity has to be internalised on one’s life before active commitment. Maybe it is due to the lack of a clear conceptualisation and personal internalisation that we can find one of the main clues to explain the passivity of laity in the mission of the Church. Obviously, action should follow the process of internalising faith.

The Council Fathers taught: "The Christian vocation by its very nature is also a vocation to the apostolate"[2]. Have we seen a general lay commitment to apostolate? Obviously, there are wonderful exceptions, among them the ecclesial movements. However, the question in its general sense stands. Notwithstanding other causes such as subjectivism, functional agnosticism, secularism, and others, or even taking them in account, we would certainly see a very different world if the lay Catholic understood his commitment to the apostolate.

However it should be understood that following Lord Jesus cannot be restricted to the apostolate. Pope John Paul II said recently: "Faith is often confined to episodes and fragments of life. Certain relativism tends to feed discriminating attitudes toward the content of Catholic doctrine and morals, accepted or rejected on the basis of subjective and arbitrary preference. So the faith received ceases to be lived as a divine gift, as an extraordinary opportunity for human and Christian growth, as a meaningful event, as conversion of life. Only a faith that sinks its roots in the Church's sacramental life, whose thirst is quenched at the sources of God's Word and Tradition, that becomes new life and a renewed understanding of reality, can make the baptised effectively capable of withstanding the impact of the prevailing secularised culture"[3].

If we look at history, we can say that the fact that there are non-practising Catholics is nothing new. In this context practice is understood as the commitment expected of a son or daughter of the Church, not including supererogatory activities which some faithful practise. The actual phenomenon is referred to the great numbers of non-practising baptised members of the Church.

In our time, Catholic identity is suffering in many a corrosion tending to undermine it and replace it with a vague selection of usually self chosen Christian values and beliefs. These people formally do not fall away from the Church. But in their practice and daily life they do. Faith and life are divorced. This is one of the serious ailments the people of God are suffering at the present day.

However we must speak of the active lay faithful. Here we also find a lack of identity, which could be called lack of consciousness. This results in a notorious weakening of the laity. Latin American Bishops said these people's "lives reveal an inconsistency between the faith they claim to profess and practice on the one hand and the real-life involvement they assume in society on the other hand".[4] The rupture in Christian life is expressed in the four fundamental rifts: "of man with God, with self, with the brethren and with the whole of creation"[5]. Laity is particularly fragile in relation to these four deep clefts or ruptures, especially because of the insertion of laypersons in the world. Anyway, the lack of identity and coherence is expressed in lack of unity in personal life and apostolic commitment.

How else can we explain the phenomenon of the "the de-Christianization of countries with ancient Christian traditions".[6] Since the communion ecclesiology of Vatican II implies quite clearly that each member of the Church has a mission in working so all humankind will enter into a relationship with Lord Jesus, it is obvious that each one is also to be concerned with those peers in danger of losing their faith. So the "de-christianised" reality of many countries that used to have a Catholic identity is a clear sign of what is called active omission on the part of numerous laypersons. We could analyse how this responsibility extends to members of the Hierarchy, but that would lead us away from our main concern in this lecture.

On the other hand, how else can we explain what I venture to call "a new" distinction between quantitative and qualitative secularism —the former to indicate the number of people who declare themselves Catholics or comply with the precept to support the Church[7]; the latter, referred to practising Catholics? If we applied this measure of qualitative secularism to those brothers and sisters alluded to by John Paul II in Ecclesia in Europa, the numbers of people affected by qualitative secularism would rise geometrically. The Pope says: "Many of the baptised live as if Christ did not exist: the gestures and signs of faith are repeated, especially in devotional practices, but they fail to correspond to a real acceptance of the content of the faith and fidelity to the person of Jesus."[8]

Being in England, we can get some help from Cardinal Newman to go deeper into the concept of lay men and women. Speaking of the laity, he said in his Ninth Lecture they should be people "who know their religion, who enter into it, who know just where they stand, who know what they hold, and what they do not, who know their creed so well, that they can give an account of it, who know so much of history that they can defend it"[9].

Twenty years after the Council ended, a prestigious Spanish magazine published a strong statement: the "rediscovery and promotion of the laity, with its unpredictable possibilities, has just begun"[10]. After twenty years, it said that the process had just begun. Was it just a figure of speech? Or did it really mean what it said? We all know that a great deal of progress has been made in clarifying lay identity, but a lot more work is still necessary to deepen this understanding in lay men and women as well as in members of the Hierarchy. Moreover, it seems that the main idea of the aforementioned phrase still needs to be repeated almost forty years after the Council.

The rich communion ecclesiology of the Second Vatican Council, the perspective of the People of God, as well as the Pauline image of the Church as the Body of Christ, have been a wonderful ambience in which one can get a deeper understanding of the Mystery of the Church, as well as of the identity of the lay faithful and the cleric faithful, all called to be real Christifideles. This, I believe, is the core of the issue. Laypersons and clerics, we all are members of the People of God, Christifideles. "But speaking the truth in love, we must grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, from whom the whole body, joined and knit together by every ligament with which it is equipped, as each part is working properly, promotes the body's growth in building itself up in love."[11]

2. Faithful and lay

An anecdotic example will help us to highlight the urgent need there is to define the identity of the lay faithful. Nearly forty years after the Council, one can still read some Pastoral Letters addressed: "To priests, religious, pastoral agents and faithful".

Some humorist could say: Are all those that precede the faithful unfaithful? Obviously the intention is not to deny the fidelity of the clergy, religious and pastoral agents in general. But it certainly reveals confusion and a tendency to identify faithful with lay. It could also hide, at least in some cases, a non-conscious difficulty to recognize the specificity of the laity as having a mission in the Church. That approach does not seem in harmony with the teaching of the Church that says that all baptised are the faithful, from the Holy Father to the youngest baby. For example if one reads the last documents of the Pope one can see time and again how the Holy Father is calling the layperson lay faithful, Christifidelis laicus.

The Code of Canon Law has in its favour the synthetic expression of its canons. So I will just quote what it says in relation to who are the faithful in the Roman Catholic Church. "Christ’s faithful are those who, since they are incorporated into Christ through baptism, are constituted the People of God. For this reason they participate in their own way in the priestly, prophetic and kingly office of Christ. They are called, each according to his or her particular condition, to exercise the mission which God entrusted to the Church to fulfil in the world".[12]

So we can easily see that all the baptised are the faithful. Lay and faithful are not synonyms. Without the distinction between faithful and lay, the last may become in practice those that have no mission in the Church. The history of passing over the lay faithful in the Church is a very long one and it is worth taking a moment to examine some aspects of the way the role of lay men and women has been curtailed.

Clericalism is still very strong in several parts of the world. The clericalisation of the lay faithful goes to such extremes as to project clerical spiritualities and practices on laypersons. What is obligatory to a cleric might be supererogatory to a lay man or woman.

But clericalisation has another side —the aspiration of the lay faithful to a more intense participation as a pseudo cleric—. Deprived of his lay identity, or this having been weakened or diminished, some laypersons do all they can to substitute the ordained ministers, whom they consider in some way the authentic Christians.

There is also the danger of laicising the clergy. The base for this is a misconception of the clerical state. We can see in this that the identity crisis is extended even to the ordained ministers of the Church.

Reaching again to the Code we can read that: "Since lay people, like all Christ’s faithful, are deputed to the apostolate by Baptism and Confirmation, they are bound by the general obligation and they have the right, whether as individuals or in associations, to strive so that the divine message of salvation may be known and accepted by all people throughout the world. This obligation is all the more insistent in circumstances in which only through them are people able to hear the Gospel and to know Christ"[13].

"They have also, according to the condition of each, the special obligation to permeate and perfect the temporal order of things with the spirit of the Gospel. In this way, particularly in conducting secular business and exercising secular functions, they are to give witness to Christ"[14].

So we can say that we all are bricks of the Church and also Church’s builders.

In the realm of laypersons, the vocation to marriage receives a dignified attention in the teaching of the Church. The ones called to it are to strive to contribute in building the Church through their marriage and family. Marriage is recognised as a special vocation. There is a calling to be married. And in the Christian life of couples, not excluding there general identity, rights and duties, as lay faithful, marriage and the bringing up of a family has a defining role.

Marriage is a vocation to holiness. That is something to be remembered. People called to marry or married couples are to strive for their sanctification in the construction of a cenacle of love as a couple and as a family. The family is like a "domestic church", where husband and wife, living a Christian life, should help each other in their way to holiness, and by their teaching and example educate their children in the faith of the Church. They should respect the freedom they have as children of God, and encourage them to follow the vocation to which they are called, having special care to give them support if God calls them to follow the path of consecrated life or sacred orders in their way to holiness[15].

Our world is crying out loud asking for the testimony of Catholic couples and of Catholic families. The family is the first school of Christian life, as well as the nursery to begin the learning of what the universal call to holiness means, and what it stands for. Family and marriage is the vocation for the majority of lay faithful. If only for that reason, it deserves to be taken even more seriously. As the Holy Father teaches, there should be a preparation for marriage, a remote, proximate and immediate preparation. Marriage and bringing up a family is not something to improvise. And, afterwards, the couple should engage in a permanent formation process.

3. A Spiritual Family

Basically in the Church there are two states or ways of being. We have the sacred ministers or clerics and the lay people. There should be no confusions here.

From both these general vocations, as basic ways to follow Christ, some faithful are called to consecrate themselves to God and to fully dedicate their lives to the mission of salvation of the Church. These consecrated faithful have their own special ways of life which are recognised and approved by the authorities of the Church, and finally by the Holy Father. So, in consecrated life in the Church there are consecrated clerics and consecrated laypersons. The name by which they are called, religious, consecrated or any other, depends on traditions, styles, emphasis.

The inspiration that both general vocations, clerical and lay, are not opposites but complementary in the Church was at the bottom of the birth of Sodalitium Christianae Vitae, back in 1971. Now it is a Society of Apostolic Life approved by the Holy Father in 1997.

The Sodalitium is integrated mainly by consecrated laymen and a less number of priests. Since 2001, by special authorization of the Holy Father, the priests are incardinated in the Society.

It is a secular Society, with communal life and dedicated to the apostolate. The way for its members to walk the road of perfection in charity is through the apostolate. Members profess obedience, celibacy, and communication of goods according to the Constitutions approved by the Church.

The experience of mutual respect and collaboration among clergymen and laymen is an expression of the common dignity as children of the Church, and of the understanding of how laymen and clerics hold in high regard the vocation and mission each one has and the common call that has taken them to consecrate their lives to God under a distinctive spirituality.

From the experience of the Sodalitium, a Society for men, two associations for consecrated women have developed, each one with its own accents in the unity of the common spirituality.

The two societies for women came into existence precisely through the experience of the Christian Life Movement, which is one of the ecclesial movements the Holy Spirit has called into being in the 20th century to face the challenges of the Third millennium. The Pope has said that one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit for our time is certainly the flourishing of ecclesial movements. "The movements and new communities, providential expressions of the new springtime brought forth by the Spirit with the Second Vatican Council, announce the power of God’s love which in overcoming divisions and barriers of every kind, renews the face of the earth to build the civilization of love"[16]. "Ecclesial movements, every one of them from their own unique experience and style, are called to contribute to the renewal of Christian life in the People of God (…) In these expressions of associated life, creative and original ways to live Christian life, to reach peoples and cultures, can be discovered. But this, certainly, demands new adaptations, accommodated to the needs of human beings today, and at the same time coherent with the truth revealed by the Lord Jesus, who is the same yesterday, today and always"[17]

All these institutions and some others form a Spiritual Family where lay people and clerics can deepen their faith, share their spiritual experience, walk the path to holiness, work for establishing the Kingdom of God, evangelise the culture, transform this world according to what God has in his divine Plan and the Church teaches.

Each person, lay or cleric, participates in this endeavour according to his or her vocation, condition and state of life. Priests as priests, consecrated men and women as such, and married couples and young people according to their Christian life as lay faithful. All of them present in the heart of the world[18] searching to answer in everything to God's Plan[19].

4. Conclusion of this first part

I hope this brief exposition has given us all an idea of who a lay faithful is, and how, as a baptised member of the Church, he or she has a genuine equality of dignity and action among all of Christ’s faithful, a horizon to work for his own holiness according to his or her vocation, to help others walk the path to holiness, to announce the Good News to the best of his capacity, and to help build a better world and evangelise the culture.

II. Christian life

Now I believe we can go on to reflect on the other element, Christian life, lived by lay faithful.

1. Life

So we enter the topic of life. Jesus himself speaks to us of His mission. By faith we know that He, the Eternal Word of God, incarnated in the Virgin of Nazareth, our Blessed Mother, is the Life[20]. He also reveals us that He came to us so that we would have life and so that we have it in abundance.[21]

When one speaks of life it is usually in reference to the natural life of the human being. However, in the biblical conception of the Old and New Testaments life is not restricted just to existence, or to being in the world. It is not only a concept limited to the natural horizon, but rather goes beyond it.

In the Old Testament as in the New Testament’s Revelation, life transcends that first concept that we shall call "primary", and refers rather to life as fullness of health, as an integral concept that embraces all the good that there is in the human being. When speaking of life we are referring to the sum of goods that the human being can have.

Therefore, life is opposed to what doesn't exist —because what is inexistent doesn't have life—, as well as it opposes death — because it is the termination of a certain life—, illness —that is an attack or limitation of life—, but in its higher sense it is also opposed to evil, wrongdoing, that are basically anti-life in a deeper sense.

As we understand this we advance towards what Jesus' Revelation presents to our minds and hearts. It is in that Revelation where we understand life acquiring its full sense. In fact, life in Christian terms is not a latent life, some type of vegetative existence, but rather it is a qualitatively intense life, an authentic experience of fullness.

Lord Jesus, God made man in the Woman for the salvation and reconciliation of the mankind, shows Himself as the paradigm and content of Life, I mean of the authentic life: Christian life. Christ shows Himself as the Life open to share himself generously with all human beings that are hungry and thirsty for a truly full life, and introduce them to his His vital dynamism.

This way of understanding Christian life summarizes God’s bounty goodness as received by us through and in Jesus Christ.

2. Mary, bearer and educator of Christian life

Our Lord invited us to recognise Mary as our Mother, being one of a mother's responsibilities to educate her children. Mary, the same as all responsible human mothers, and even more so, stays close to her children, and respecting their freedom and dignity, cares for them with fine discretion. She helps and accompanies them in their growth and maturation in the faith. In this way, together with her intercession, and her obtaining blessings, the Mother of kindness intervenes in the education of her children in the faith, to be the Church. "While we are on pilgrimage, Mary will be the Mother who educates us in the faith[22]. She sees to it that the Gospel penetrates us, shapes our daily lives and produces fruits of holiness. More and more she must become the teacher of the Gospel"[23].

Let us look at Mary, paradigmatic Christian lay person. As we do that, let us let ourselves be educated by her.

The Virgin of Nazareth is a prayerful young woman. She is a searcher for God’s Plan. She asks the fundamental questions about human existence and finds that God is the only answer. In her interior silence she hears the promises of God to his people, and maintains a lively echo. Filled with wonder, she experiences the angel transmitting her the Plan of God. In total freedom and with intense faith, she answers: "genoito", "fiat", "let it be done".[24] And by doing so she receives the Life in her virginal womb. At the same time the Life comes to Her and flows in Her giving the fullness of life. She feels the urge to always answer with coherence to the blessing she has received. Trying to declare the greatness of the mother-child relation in Mary and Jesus, one could say that as the Eternal Word of God incarnated in her womb, Her Heart was made full with the presence of Her son. In any case, we should understand that the Virgin Mary lives the Christian life received from her Son. That is why one can say she was the first Christian, from the time She conceived Jesus through the Holy Spirit.

The praying Virgin never ceases to be filled with wonder. On the Annunciation She humbly and fully opened her Heart to the mystery. During the rest of her life She takes all of her Son’s words and deeds into her Immaculate Heart. For her, meditation is a permanent attitude. She is constantly receiving Christ’s Life and going deeper into the meaning it has for her own path towards the perfection of charity in lovingly following Jesus, as the expected reconciler of humanity. Mary’s life is a constant sign of coherence. She assimilates and cherishes the Life, her Son. She freely allows the Life she is receiving to express itself unhindered in herself. Before the Apostle Paul wrote she was living the reality of his words: "I live, but not me, Christ lives in me".[25] Mary is a docile collaborator of the Plan of God. And her coherence overcomes the test of duration and hardships, all the way to the Golgotha. Her "fiat" in the Annunciation finds its fullness in the silent "fiat" that she repeats at the foot of the Cross and afterwards in the Cenacle of Jerusalem.

As she humanly educates Jesus, she is educated by Him, since the first moment. She has a treasure and she wants to share it immediately. The Visitation could be the expression of the Virgin of action. Mary’s life is nurtured by the Life that is Christ. She, the "full of grace", answers to the miracle in which she is a special part. As Life flows through her she perceives the impulse to visit her relative Elizabeth. She carries in her womb Life itself. So she hurries to the highlands of Judah to the house of Zachariah. She brings with her the Living Gospel, Jesus. And she presents Him to Elizabeth, who filled with the Holy Spirit loudly exclaims: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb!"[26] Immediately she bursts out ardently pronouncing the first confession of faith: "How is it that the mother of my Lord should come to me"[27].

Christian life, lived in one's existence, demands to be communicated. That is the apostolic dimension to which all of us Christians are called.

At the same time that Mary evangelises the members of the house of Zachariah, she serves the needs of their relatives with great charity. We can see that in the union of life in Mary there is neither divorce nor opposition of any kind between announcing and testifying to the Word and serving humanity and promoting the good of mankind. Mary is a vital synthesis of how evangelization and human service and transformation of human realities should be lived. Once again we can see what coherence means in Mary’s paradigmatic Christian life.

Mary's role in our education is a continuation in time and in space of the education that she gave to Jesus. It is also a projection of the Christian life in which she was educated by Our Lord. All her actions are directed towards the configuration with the First-born, in such a way that the faithful acquire the likeness with Him who is the Way, Truth and Life[28]. With the sweet fondness of her spiritual maternity Mary becomes present in the life of her children. Cooperating with God’s grace She helps us, her children, to open ourselves up to Jesus so that He is born in us. She watches how the fundamental dynamisms of her children are freed from the obstacles that enslave them and are guided thru the path of reconciliation towards the discovery of their true identity and of the full conformation with the Lord of Life.

As we look at Mary, as we answer to the words Christ pronounced from the Cross high, "She is your mother", we should open ourselves to the reality Mary shows us as paradigm of Christian life in her reality of layperson.

III. Horizons

The lay faithful is invited to holiness. That teleological horizon should permeate the whole Christian life of the layperson. It should be an element of unity such as to give one a continual element to overcome divorce between faith and daily life.

The Blessed Virgin Mary shows us an integral perspective of the life of a layperson, opened to the configuration with the Lord Jesus and addressing human responsibilities from such a fundamental life.

If we are to try to answer the identity crisis of the layperson that moves him or her to auto-exclude from the mission given in Baptism, we should begin by understanding what being a baptised person means.

The horizons opened by such awareness should help the lay faithful in his way to holiness, helping him or her to understand that Christian life can not be suspended at will, but that one must let it flow vitalising all of our daily actions.

There are many aspects I have had to skip or briefly develop. However, they are open for your inquiry. I am worried because there are so many of us Catholics that do not understand their call and the great gift it means. The world needs witnesses. People that do not fall into the trap of functional agnosticism, putting a parenthesis to their Christian life while acting different roles in the world. We cannot be absent. We must be conscious of our identity as lay faithful and act with coherence in the different responsibilities we have in life. As Cardinal Newman said so succinctly and yet so truly: "In all times the laity has been the measure of the Catholic spirit".[29]

So each one of us has the responsibility to live his Christian life and let it express itself in the different areas of our world and culture. The faith that is blazing in our hearts should irradiate in our actions helping the coming of the Civilization of Love.

God bless you all.


NOTES

[1] Head of the School of Theology, Philosophy, and History, St. Mary’s College of the University of Surrey.

[2] Second Vatican Council, Apostolicam actuositatem, 2.

[3] John Paul II, Address to the participants in the 20th Plenary Assembly of the Pontifical Council for the Laity, Saturday, November 23, 2002, 3.

[4] Third General Conference of Latin American Bishops, Conclusions, 783.

[5] John Paul II, Reconciliatio et paenitentia, 26.

[6] John Paul II, Redemptoris missio, 32.

[7] The responsibility to support the Church in some countries is said of the Pastors. In any case it comes to the financial cooperation or solidarity of Church members that has been usually understood as paying tithes.

[8] John Paul II, Ecclesia in Europa, 47.

[9] Cardinal John Henry Newman, Lecture 9, 4.

[10] D. Salado, Ideas básicas del Concilio Vaticano II sobre espiritualidad laical, in "Vida sobrenatural", Salamanca, November-December 1985, n. 522, p. 422.

[11] Eph 4:15-16.

[12] Code of Canon Law, 204, 1: "Christifideles sunt qui, utpote per baptismum Christo incorporati, in populum Dei sunt constituti, atque hac ratione muneris Christi sacerdotalis, prophetici et regalis suo modo participes facti, secundum propriam cuiusque condicionem, ad missionem exercendam vocantur, quam Deus Ecclesiae in mundo adimplendam concredidit".

[13] Code of Canon Law, 225, 1.

[14] Code of Canon Law, 225, 2.

[15] Cfr. Second Vatican Council, Lumen gentium, 11.

[16] John Paul II, Pentecost Sunday, May 31, 1998, 2.

[17] Germán Doig, Giovanni Paolo II e i movimenti ecclesiali, Dono dello Spirito, Elledici, 1999, p. 90.

[18] Cf. Paul VI, Evangelii nuntiandi, 70.

[19] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Lumen gentium, 31.

[20] Jn 14:6.

[21] Cf. Jn 10:10.

[22] Second Vatican Council, Lumen gentium, 63.

[23] Third General Conference of Latin American Bishops, Conclusions, 290.

[24] Lk 1:38.

[25] Gal 2:20.

[26] Lk 1:42.

[27] Lk 1:43.

[28] Cfr. Jn 14:6.

[29] Cardinal John Henry Newman, Lecture 9, 4.

< Prev   Next >